Modern Metal engine improves playback, rendering, and compositing on all Macs. Harness the power of the Mac Pro and Afterburner for realtime 8K editing. Improved performance and efficiency on Mac computers with Apple silicon.
![]() Again, faster RAM unfortunately does not make up for the 16GB limit. There is one more difference though: it seems like t he non touch bar Macbook Pro uses 1866MHz LPDDR3 RAM while the touch bar version uses 2133MHz LPDDR3, making the RAM faster. 32 would be better and recommended for 4K video editing. But according to arstechnica.com:The two ports on the right side of the MacBook Pro have “reduced PCI Express bandwidth,” which Apple says means they have two PCIe 3.0 lanes worth of bandwidth at their disposal instead of the four lanes dedicated to the ports on the left sideThis seems to be worse when connecting high-performance storage arrays like 4K editors usually do, so you should connect those only to the left-side ports.In terms of RAM, unfortunately all Macbook Pro 2016 models max out at 16GB. Its CPU multicore score is about 41% higher than the 13-inch models, but surprisingly it is weaker than the 2015 model…These results are in line with Engadget’s findings on their review, so they seem to be accurate.IFixit opened up the 13-inch Macbook Pro 2016According to another source ( arstechnica.com) there are some other technical differences between the touch bar and non touch bar models that are worth pointing out:Aside from the CPU and GPU clock speed differences, the touch bar model’s 28W CPU can run faster for longer and throttles less frequently in comparison to the non touch bar 15W CPU.The non touch bar 2016 Macbook Pro only has two Thunderbolt 3 ports vs the four on the touch bar model. Mini For Video Editing 2016 1080P Video EditingIt’s not a win where it counts.In their review, it was a different story with the 15-inch model. In their tests, however, the 13-inch MacBook Pro could handle small 4K files smoothly in Final Cut X.The 13-inch MacBook Pro can handle small 4K files smoothly in Final Cut Pro, but that isn’t the app that most editors use. They say that the 13 inch is snappy and “without hiccups” in day-to-day use, 1080p video editing in Adobe Premiere is no problem, but apparently 4K video “becomes unworkable”. 4K in the Real World?So, how do these facts translate to real world 4K video editing? In their review of the 13-inch touch bar Macbook Pro 2016, the Verge offers some insights. Fire emblem 8 hack rom downloadIn terms of speed, at least the 15-inch Macbook Pro 2016 seems to be ready to perform basic 4K video editing tasks, but as soon as you’re working on a bigger project, unfortunately none of the 2016 Macbook Pros seem to be ideal.But there are positive voices too. Wow.As far as I can tell, this is probably due to the 16GB RAM limit on the Macbook Pro 2016. But on larger project files “the computer starts lagging pretty seriously” and the performance was better on the 2013 iMac. If they do, then there’s a lot of power and potential to be harnessed from these machines. He also equipped his setup with USB-C SSD’s, eliminating the need for additional dongles.Thomas enjoys the touch bar on Final Cut X and seems to suggest that people need to adapt to the design decisions Apple laid out with the new Macbook Pros. In his article at Huffington Post Tech, Thomas shares his experience working on Final Cut X as “ buttery smooth” and says:The software and hardware are so well integrated it tears strips off “superior spec’d” Windows counterparts in the real world.Thomas would consider the 15-inch Macbook Pro 2016 his 24/7 edit suite for both office work with 2 connected 5K displays as well as work in the field. With the need for higher resolutions like 4K, more color depth and ever-more complex processes during a 4K workflow, the need for higher performance machines has risen in recent last years also.So is the new Macbook Pro 2016 fast enough for 4K Video Editing? Unfortunately, it seems like the power of the new 2016 Macbook Pros is not up to speed with this development. Even if we don’t like to admit it, Apple has cleverly bound users to their eco system and has been making them adapt to and rely on their systems for a while. ConclusionI’m trying really hard to love the new Macbook Pros and probably many professionals find themselves in the same position. As machines for day-to-day office tasks, photo and 1080p video, they probably perform remarkably well, and the build quality and simplicity is beautiful and enjoyable. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorSam ArchivesCategories |